Ridiculous idea from one professor with the surname of Ishimatsu who is a fan of Jobs

「XXX企業の内部データ例えば取り締まり役会議議事録を取得できなければ，CEO のリーダーシップはどこまで企業のメンバーたちに影響するのか分からない，そしてXXX企業の異なったCEOの管理様式を比較する研究テーマ設定は無理がある」という意見が，日本の苗字が石松のある教授の意見だ。そんな意見が成立できれば，歴史上では「XXX企業の内部データ例えば取り締まり役会議議事録」ということの公開は極めて少ないため，欧米から中国を経て日本まで，XXX企業の誰々CEOとか創業者とかの管理様式と経営方針を探究対象にして極めてたくさんの学術雑誌や学術著作で掲載した研究は，全て「無理」の物になり，更にXXX企業の誰々CEOの管理様式を話題に新聞記事やビジネス業界の専門家評論やライバル社の討論なども，全て娯楽の冗談に成された。もしそれらは理不尽な冗談や無理な研究ではないと，「XXX企業の内部データ例えば取り締まり役会議議事録を取得できなければ，CEO のリーダーシップはどこまで企業のメンバーたちに影響するのか分からない，そしてXXX企業の異なったCEOの管理様式を比較する研究テーマ設定は無理がある」というものでは，あの石松自分自身がJobsのカルトなファンとして，Jobsを批評する内容を含めた他人の論文に対して，「ならずもらしい口実」を武器にして虐めるにすぎない。

A professor who come from Japan, whose surname is Ishimatsu, is of the opinion that "without access to the internal data of XXX companies, for example, the minutes of the board of directors meetings, it is impossible to know to what extent CEO leadership affects the members of the company, and it is impossible to set up a research theme comparing different CEO management styles in XXX companies". This is a absurd opinion of a professor whose surname is Ishimatsu in Japan. If such an opinion can be validated, then, since there has been very little publication of "internal data of XXX companies, e.g. minutes of meetings of the board of directors" in history, it would be "impossible" for all the research published in so many academic journals and works, from Europe and the USA, through China to Japan, to explore the management styles and management policies of the CEOs and founders of XXX companies. Furthermore, newspaper articles, business industry expert reviews and rival company discussions on the topic of the management style of CEOs of XXX enterprises have all been turned into amusing jokes. If they are not unreasonable jokes or unreasonable studies, they can be considered as "If we cannot obtain the internal data of XXX companies, for example, the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors, to what extent the leadership of the CEO influences the members of the company, and the research topic of comparing the different management styles of the CEOs of XXX companies is impossible to set up". In this case, Ishimatsu himself, as a cult fan of Jobs, is merely using a "rogue pretext" as a weapon against other people's papers that include criticisms of Jobs.